PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.07%
Negative revenue growth while VTLE stands at 5.62%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-15.51%
Negative gross profit growth while VTLE is at 7.30%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-37.21%
Negative EBIT growth while VTLE is at 7.53%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-37.21%
Negative operating income growth while VTLE is at 7.53%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
133.62%
Positive net income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
131.25%
Positive EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
131.25%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.96%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-18.66%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-52.08%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-27.47%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 22.93%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-57.22%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 22.93%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-20.55%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 22.93%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
19.51%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 15.10%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
-60.24%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is at 15.10%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-20.86%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 15.10%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
34.57%
Positive 10Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
14.92%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
53.00%
Positive short-term CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-25.90%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while VTLE stands at 144.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-71.54%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 144.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-60.18%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 144.36%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
34.87%
Dividend/share CAGR of 34.87% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-83.16%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-66.20%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-3.69%
Firm’s AR is declining while VTLE shows 18.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-4.28%
Inventory is declining while VTLE stands at 197.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
8.90%
Asset growth above 1.5x VTLE's 3.23%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
32.38%
Positive BV/share change while VTLE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-1.51%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.53%
SG&A growth well above VTLE's 6.86%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.