PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.36%
Negative revenue growth while VTLE stands at 18.50%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
7.74%
Positive gross profit growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
20.56%
Positive EBIT growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
20.56%
Positive operating income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-92.95%
Negative net income growth while VTLE stands at 141.32%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-64.64%
Negative EPS growth while VTLE is at 140.68%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-64.64%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VTLE is at 141.38%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.96%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-62.50%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-708.16%
Negative FCF growth while VTLE is at 41.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-6.27%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 146.84%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
300.94%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 146.84%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-9.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 29.38%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-67.83%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 62.54%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-80.97%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is at 62.54%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-76.64%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-87.90%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is at 406.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-68.44%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is 406.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
179.97%
Below 50% of VTLE's 9638.69%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
6.74%
Below 50% of VTLE's 235.99%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-40.91%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 235.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-41.05%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 55.84%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
70.89%
Dividend/share CAGR of 70.89% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-66.21%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-66.21%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
51.21%
AR growth well above VTLE's 5.81%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.41%
Asset growth at 75-90% of VTLE's 17.99%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
1.97%
Under 50% of VTLE's 15.35%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
15.15%
Debt growth far above VTLE's 14.27%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.69%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.