PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-51.66%
Negative revenue growth while VTLE stands at 37.74%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-93.69%
Negative gross profit growth while VTLE is at 779.44%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-226.72%
Negative EBIT growth while VTLE is at 232.53%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-226.72%
Negative operating income growth while VTLE is at 232.53%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-58.58%
Negative net income growth while VTLE stands at 56.45%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-57.78%
Negative EPS growth while VTLE is at 57.44%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-58.74%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VTLE is at 57.67%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.51%
Share reduction more than 1.5x VTLE's 2.32%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.81%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-47.13%
Negative OCF growth while VTLE is at 45.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
34.65%
FCF growth under 50% of VTLE's 77.61%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-90.63%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-84.06%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-84.05%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-96.50%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-92.50%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-86.97%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-127.28%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-397.03%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-171.59%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-73.41%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-74.88%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-19.61%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-86.86%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-93.49%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-91.14%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
3.27%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. VTLE's 14.52%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.82%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-11.31%
We have a declining book value while VTLE shows 119.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
3.77%
We have some new debt while VTLE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.36%
We cut SG&A while VTLE invests at 5.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.