PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
168.96%
Revenue growth above 1.5x VTLE's 8.83%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
2212.00%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x VTLE's 30.55%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
129.91%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VTLE's 42.62%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
129.91%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VTLE's 42.62%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
152.75%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 111.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
152.11%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 110.68%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
152.26%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 110.58%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
1.40%
Share reduction more than 1.5x VTLE's 8.40%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.99%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x VTLE's 9.44%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
16.55%
Dividend growth of 16.55% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
124.10%
OCF growth above 1.5x VTLE's 30.09%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
85.61%
Positive FCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-76.47%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 41.51%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-64.31%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-39.50%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-89.40%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 71.92%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-88.07%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-82.89%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-78.00%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
126.62%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
45.04%
Positive short-term CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-68.23%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-67.75%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-0.97%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-84.68%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-92.41%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-89.55%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
50.63%
Our AR growth while VTLE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.34%
Negative asset growth while VTLE invests at 9.09%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
25.25%
Under 50% of VTLE's 1783.93%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-20.74%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.93%
We cut SG&A while VTLE invests at 27.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.