PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.51%
Revenue growth similar to VTLE's 8.05%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
3.37%
Gross profit growth under 50% of VTLE's 7.65%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
28.63%
Positive EBIT growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
28.63%
Positive operating income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
165.94%
Positive net income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
167.80%
Positive EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
167.80%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.12%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.16%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
7.28%
Dividend growth of 7.28% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
3.25%
OCF growth under 50% of VTLE's 29.78%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
9.29%
FCF growth above 1.5x VTLE's 2.99%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-83.85%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 27.22%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-6.77%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-18.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 17.50%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-82.83%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 1.14%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-15.24%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is at 24.02%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-38.34%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 271.73%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
28.60%
Below 50% of VTLE's 872.11%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
126.34%
Below 50% of VTLE's 3178.69%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
106.90%
Below 50% of VTLE's 12597.91%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-72.96%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
8.36%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-44.46%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-96.04%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-92.33%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-69.21%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
80.59%
Our AR growth while VTLE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while VTLE stands at 68.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.03%
Negative asset growth while VTLE invests at 3.18%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.84%
Under 50% of VTLE's 23.59%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-2.33%
We’re deleveraging while VTLE stands at 7.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.83%
We cut SG&A while VTLE invests at 4.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.