PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.13%
Negative revenue growth while VTLE stands at 35.18%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-45.65%
Negative gross profit growth while VTLE is at 4.40%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-134.42%
Negative EBIT growth while VTLE is at 1.69%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-134.42%
Negative operating income growth while VTLE is at 1.69%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-200.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-200.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-198.75%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-2.86%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.18%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-3.92%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
24.67%
Positive OCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
5.51%
FCF growth under 50% of VTLE's 11.30%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-89.33%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 44.25%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-61.36%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 9.20%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
5.56%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VTLE's 75.98%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-81.09%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-33.13%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
42.08%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 21.39%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-109.83%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-116.13%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
91.64%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to VTLE's 97.12%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
-75.19%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while VTLE stands at 13.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-4.53%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-25.92%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-96.29%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-89.89%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-66.27%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
4.25%
AR growth well above VTLE's 3.55%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.12%
Asset growth well under 50% of VTLE's 5.83%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-1.30%
We have a declining book value while VTLE shows 5.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-0.88%
We’re deleveraging while VTLE stands at 6.54%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.50%
SG&A growth well above VTLE's 8.53%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.