PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
28.38%
Positive revenue growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
46.50%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x VTLE's 7.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
202.59%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VTLE's 10.18%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
202.59%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VTLE's 10.18%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
125.83%
Net income growth under 50% of VTLE's 539.56%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
125.00%
EPS growth under 50% of VTLE's 544.44%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
125.32%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of VTLE's 544.44%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
1.20%
Slight or no buybacks while VTLE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.51%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-1.19%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
86.32%
OCF growth above 1.5x VTLE's 25.66%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
401.67%
FCF growth above 1.5x VTLE's 26.26%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-90.79%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 152.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-29.92%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-15.32%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 70.42%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-77.27%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 138.96%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-26.83%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
71.99%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 20.19%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-99.14%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is at 79.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-83.96%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is 155.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
102.78%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to VTLE's 105.95%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
-78.42%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-7.26%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-14.91%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-96.32%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-89.89%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-67.57%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-16.54%
Firm’s AR is declining while VTLE shows 16.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.26%
Asset growth well under 50% of VTLE's 5.00%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-1.23%
We have a declining book value while VTLE shows 5.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-0.03%
We’re deleveraging while VTLE stands at 6.70%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.70%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.