PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
88.67%
Positive revenue growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
189.76%
Positive gross profit growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1037.82%
Positive EBIT growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1037.82%
Positive operating income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
2541.03%
Net income growth above 1.5x VTLE's 171.70%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
2595.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x VTLE's 170.83%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
2595.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x VTLE's 170.83%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.18%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.98%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-36.84%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-41.99%
Negative FCF growth while VTLE is at 30.45%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-71.76%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 37.92%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
29.57%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
104.22%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 60.38%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-78.47%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 6.13%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-6.30%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
10.34%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of VTLE's 31.27%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-24.74%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is at 131.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
417.78%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 34.33%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
248.83%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 107.35%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-74.49%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while VTLE stands at 55.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
12.04%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
6.79%
Below 50% of VTLE's 720.40%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-96.59%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-74.19%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-70.52%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-35.11%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.17%
Asset growth well under 50% of VTLE's 4.33%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
14.88%
Similar to VTLE's 16.13%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-0.12%
We’re deleveraging while VTLE stands at 2.12%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.18%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.