PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-41.09%
Negative revenue growth while VTLE stands at 13.22%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-74.47%
Negative gross profit growth while VTLE is at 13.12%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-112.04%
Negative EBIT growth while VTLE is at 10.27%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-112.04%
Negative operating income growth while VTLE is at 10.27%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-117.41%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-117.74%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-117.74%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.81%
Share reduction while VTLE is at 1.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.42%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
45.62%
Dividend growth of 45.62% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-7.43%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-26.65%
Negative FCF growth while VTLE is at 124.70%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-37.45%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 34.01%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
14.66%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VTLE's 100.51%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
51.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of VTLE's 75.27%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
-36.48%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
388.56%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 90.70%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
22.90%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of VTLE's 51.75%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-1248.98%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-142.27%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
6.64%
Positive short-term CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-68.37%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-45.73%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 19.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-57.09%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-79.76%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
162.09%
Dividend/share CAGR of 162.09% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
76.26%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 76.26% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
46.22%
AR growth well above VTLE's 40.67%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.01%
Asset growth at 75-90% of VTLE's 6.84%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
-6.93%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-0.05%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.73%
SG&A declining or stable vs. VTLE's 61.13%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.