PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
89.93%
Revenue growth above 1.5x VTLE's 5.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
309.76%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x VTLE's 30.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
971.26%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VTLE's 38.29%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
971.26%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VTLE's 38.29%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
663.07%
Net income growth above 1.5x VTLE's 402.54%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
661.70%
EPS growth above 1.5x VTLE's 401.16%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
654.26%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x VTLE's 397.49%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.08%
Share reduction while VTLE is at 0.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
1.24%
Diluted share count expanding well above VTLE's 1.62%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
23.17%
Dividend growth of 23.17% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
96.20%
OCF growth at 75-90% of VTLE's 115.43%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
255.98%
FCF growth under 50% of VTLE's 1217.94%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
192.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 50.16%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
161.01%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 112.85%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
95.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 77.71%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
21.95%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of VTLE's 28.04%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
366.46%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 180.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
59.30%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 37.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
152.43%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of VTLE's 219.53%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
210.19%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 107.27%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
333.70%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 4.08%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-51.25%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-35.07%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 48.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-37.58%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-75.07%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
245.88%
Dividend/share CAGR of 245.88% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
174.91%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 174.91% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.23%
Our AR growth while VTLE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.15%
Asset growth well under 50% of VTLE's 5.38%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
24.37%
Under 50% of VTLE's 59.56%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-15.45%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.15%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.