PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.50%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
8.09%
Positive gross profit growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-15.22%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-15.22%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
12.56%
Positive net income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
14.68%
Positive EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
14.47%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.98%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.72%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-6.54%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-9.04%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
14.63%
Positive FCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
19.07%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
108.65%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 10.28%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
115.36%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 17.64%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-27.39%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
86.39%
Positive OCF/share growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
25.77%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1092.89%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 285.92% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
558.23%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
23446.77%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 134.47%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-13.60%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-10.17%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 5.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-18.75%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-78.01%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
205.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 205.07% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
128.06%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 128.06% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-9.15%
Firm’s AR is declining while VTLE shows 0.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.74%
Positive asset growth while VTLE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
19.76%
BV/share growth above 1.5x VTLE's 12.41%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.75%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.99%
We cut SG&A while VTLE invests at 45.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.