PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-11.65%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-22.33%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-27.12%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-27.12%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
0.59%
Net income growth under 50% of VTLE's 155.50%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
2.40%
EPS growth under 50% of VTLE's 153.76%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
2.42%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of VTLE's 152.15%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.30%
Share reduction while VTLE is at 2.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.54%
Reduced diluted shares while VTLE is at 5.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.12%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
52.98%
OCF growth under 50% of VTLE's 113.38%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
480.44%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 341.48%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
-22.38%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
11.78%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
27.55%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-26.83%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
15.45%
Positive OCF/share growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
31.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 1.12%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-30.15%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is at 137.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
4.99%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
261.68%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 109.64%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-15.54%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
7.00%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
155.92%
Below 50% of VTLE's 740.17%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-12.18%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
227.32%
Dividend/share CAGR of 227.32% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
207.52%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 207.52% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-2.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.13%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.97%
Positive BV/share change while VTLE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-1.69%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.44%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.