PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.97%
Positive revenue growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
92.74%
Gross profit growth under 50% of VTLE's 189.17%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
9.56%
Positive EBIT growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
9.56%
Positive operating income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
49.12%
Net income growth under 50% of VTLE's 486.62%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
50.78%
EPS growth under 50% of VTLE's 475.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
51.18%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of VTLE's 490.72%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.54%
Share reduction while VTLE is at 2.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.53%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.45%
Dividend growth of 0.45% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
1.38%
Positive OCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
22.62%
FCF growth under 50% of VTLE's 164.35%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-42.48%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
25.40%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
27.45%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-16.96%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
36.47%
Positive OCF/share growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
23.48%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of VTLE's 27.13%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
-89.79%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
243.51%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 125.14%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
790.85%
Positive short-term CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-36.56%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
8.42%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
175.31%
Below 50% of VTLE's 473.66%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-13.51%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
228.10%
Dividend/share CAGR of 228.10% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
106.82%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 106.82% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.20%
Our AR growth while VTLE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
257.99%
Asset growth above 1.5x VTLE's 18.77%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.78%
Similar to VTLE's 4.65%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-3.10%
We’re deleveraging while VTLE stands at 42.48%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.49%
We cut SG&A while VTLE invests at 46.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.