PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.01%
Negative revenue growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is -2.33%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-2.20%
Negative gross profit growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is -6.01%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-9.43%
Negative EBIT growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is -5.31%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-9.43%
Negative operating income growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is -6.96%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-12.60%
Negative net income growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is -5.53%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-10.98%
Negative EPS growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is -1.31%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-11.13%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is -1.37%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.83%
Share reduction while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is 0.01%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.69%
Diluted share reduction while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-5.60%
Dividend cuts while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-28.42%
Negative OCF growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is 0.41%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-45.86%
Negative FCF growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is -0.97%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
101.88%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median of 16.70%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
217.71%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median of 98.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
98.77%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median of 58.31%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-50.89%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is 92.94%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
107.70%
5Y OCF/share growth 75-90% of Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median. John Neff would encourage margin or efficiency gains to catch up.
33.35%
Below 50% of Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median. Jim Chanos would suspect fundamental problems or inadequate monetization of sales in the near term.
155.59%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm that management’s capital allocation strategy drives the outperformance.
210.93%
5Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median. Guy Spier might question fundamental disadvantages in cost structure or growth drivers.
734.12%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median of 190.38%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-30.80%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-27.52%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-30.81%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-76.47%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
226.56%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 226.56% while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
158.99%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 158.99% while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-16.39%
AR shrinking while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-3.68%
Assets shrink while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
14.62%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-7.25%
Debt is shrinking while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.78%
SG&A growth of 9.78% while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.