PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.27%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-18.09%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-37.33%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is -8.96%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-37.33%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is -8.31%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-7.16%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
19.09%
EPS growth of 19.09% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
19.36%
Diluted EPS growth of 19.36% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-7.63%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-8.96%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
54.70%
Dividend growth of 54.70% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-4.41%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-68.29%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-4.98%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 13.68%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-4.98%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-4.98%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
91.92%
OCF/share CAGR of 91.92% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
91.92%
OCF/share CAGR of 91.92% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
91.92%
3Y OCF/share growth of 91.92% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
84.33%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 38.28% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
84.33%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 19.10%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
84.33%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 0.30%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-5.69%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-5.69%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-5.69%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-9.76%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-9.76%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-9.76%
Dividend reductions while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-17.71%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
52.18%
Inventory growth of 52.18% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
9.68%
Asset growth of 9.68% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
20.82%
BV/share growth of 20.82% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
14.53%
Debt growth of 14.53% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.40%
SG&A growth of 4.40% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.