PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.26%
Revenue growth of 10.26% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
7.26%
Gross profit growth of 7.26% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
-31.56%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-31.56%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
22.31%
Net income growth of 22.31% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
-8.55%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-8.55%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.48%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-59.62%
Dividend cuts while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-29.47%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-205.96%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
15.97%
10Y revenue/share CAGR near Energy median of 15.97%. Charlie Munger might expect stable industry trends guiding long-term growth.
15.97%
5Y CAGR of 15.97% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
15.97%
3Y CAGR of 15.97% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
13.97%
OCF/share CAGR of 13.97% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
13.97%
OCF/share CAGR of 13.97% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
13.97%
3Y OCF/share growth of 13.97% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
185.59%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 23.71% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
185.59%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 28.84%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
185.59%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 185.59% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
78.30%
Equity/share CAGR of 78.30% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
78.30%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 78.30% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
78.30%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 78.30% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
-62.10%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-62.10%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-62.10%
Dividend reductions while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
42.71%
AR growth of 42.71% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-25.88%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
7.91%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.61%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
1.99%
BV/share growth of 1.99% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
20.51%
Debt growth of 20.51% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.01%
SG&A growth far above Energy median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.