40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.24%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
31.24%
Gross profit growth of 31.24% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
-45.79%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-45.79%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-101.74%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-101.90%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-101.81%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-7.67%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-5.89%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
3.25%
Dividend growth of 3.25% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
50.48%
OCF growth of 50.48% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
16.10%
FCF growth of 16.10% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
311.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 53.81%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
311.46%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 32.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
311.46%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 25.52%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
1222.66%
OCF/share CAGR of 1222.66% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
1222.66%
OCF/share CAGR of 1222.66% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
1222.66%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Energy median of 3.71%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
-140.96%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 65.14%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-140.96%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 58.27%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-140.96%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 72.75%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
298.15%
Equity/share CAGR of 298.15% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
298.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 298.15% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
298.15%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 298.15% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
107.74%
Dividend/share CAGR of 107.74% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
107.74%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 107.74% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
107.74%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 107.74% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-18.05%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-59.28%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-0.50%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
2.73%
BV/share growth of 2.73% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-0.65%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
116.80%
SG&A growth of 116.80% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.