PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.68%
Revenue growth of 1.68% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
-15.05%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-50.68%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-50.68%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-51.59%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-56.72%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-55.93%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
11.56%
Share change of 11.56% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
9.59%
Diluted share change of 9.59% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-12.92%
Dividend cuts while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
2.05%
OCF growth of 2.05% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
163.87%
FCF growth of 163.87% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
157.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 15.80%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
157.63%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 11.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
122.16%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 3.93%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
270.05%
OCF/share CAGR of 270.05% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
270.05%
OCF/share CAGR of 270.05% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
224.70%
3Y OCF/share growth of 224.70% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
650.34%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 5.98% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
650.34%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 27.98%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
162.73%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 13.37%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
290.52%
Equity/share CAGR of 290.52% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
290.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 9.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
119.03%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 20.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
355.76%
Dividend/share CAGR of 355.76% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
355.76%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 355.76% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
1102.42%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 1102.42% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
17.20%
AR growth of 17.20% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
15.68%
Inventory growth of 15.68% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-0.31%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-15.40%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
9.64%
Debt growth of 9.64% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.06%
SG&A growth of 55.06% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.