PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.51%
Revenue growth of 26.51% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
4.70%
Gross profit growth of 4.70% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
32.40%
EBIT growth of 32.40% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
32.40%
Operating income growth of 32.40% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-24.51%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-10.71%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-12.09%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.87%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.44%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
100.38%
Dividend growth of 100.38% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
12.92%
OCF growth of 12.92% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
-6.11%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
596.28%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 41.80%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
596.28%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 44.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
142.03%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 18.96%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
1495.67%
OCF/share CAGR of 1495.67% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
1495.67%
OCF/share CAGR of 1495.67% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
78.93%
3Y OCF/share growth of 78.93% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
450.57%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 46.96% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
450.57%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 72.56%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
134.04%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 20.63%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
503.68%
Equity/share CAGR of 503.68% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
503.68%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 10.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
103.11%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 20.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
779.23%
Dividend/share CAGR of 779.23% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
779.23%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 779.23% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
354.22%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 354.22% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
37.77%
AR growth of 37.77% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
222.03%
Inventory growth of 222.03% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
12.18%
Asset growth of 12.18% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-1.36%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
5.85%
Debt growth of 5.85% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.30%
SG&A growth of 13.30% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.