PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.20%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.96%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
38.86%
Gross profit growth of 38.86% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
90.15%
EBIT growth of 90.15% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
90.15%
Operating income growth of 90.15% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-91.39%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-91.71%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-91.71%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
3.13%
Share change of 3.13% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
3.61%
Diluted share change of 3.61% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
94.37%
Dividend growth of 94.37% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-18.13%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
93.40%
FCF growth of 93.40% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
922.82%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 57.11%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
317.03%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 49.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
148.58%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 27.61%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
1593.56%
OCF/share CAGR of 1593.56% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
149.24%
OCF/share CAGR of 149.24% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
28.04%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Energy median of 2.57%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
18.73%
Below 50% of Energy median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper issues limiting long-term profit growth.
-79.80%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 33.62%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
389.91%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 21.91%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
716.56%
Equity/share CAGR of 716.56% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
256.54%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 10.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
105.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 9.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
1886.90%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1886.90% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
1566.52%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 1566.52% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
856.44%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 856.44% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
22.23%
AR growth of 22.23% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
21.79%
Inventory growth of 21.79% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
1.10%
Asset growth 50-75% of Energy median. Guy Spier sees potential underinvestment or overcaution vs. peers.
-7.09%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
5.85%
Debt growth of 5.85% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.12%
SG&A growth of 29.12% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.