PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
411.79%
Revenue growth of 411.79% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
109.76%
Gross profit growth of 109.76% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
390.41%
EBIT growth of 390.41% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
390.41%
Operating income growth of 390.41% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
134.28%
Net income growth of 134.28% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
135.22%
EPS growth of 135.22% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
131.68%
Diluted EPS growth of 131.68% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-1.53%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.26%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.88%
Dividend growth of 0.88% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-155.54%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-428.52%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
485.87%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 9.11%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
42.39%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 2.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
-15.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-873.63%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-158.49%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-148.48%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
1878.88%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 9.15% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
4931.70%
Net income/share CAGR of 4931.70% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
259.43%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 259.43% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
661.15%
Equity/share CAGR of 661.15% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
91.17%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 91.17% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
26.08%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 26.08% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
926.54%
Dividend/share CAGR of 926.54% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
394.15%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 394.15% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
16.75%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 16.75% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
11.27%
AR growth of 11.27% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
25.00%
Inventory growth of 25.00% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
0.33%
Asset growth of 0.33% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
8.72%
BV/share growth of 8.72% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
0.46%
Debt growth of 0.46% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.43%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.