PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.49%
Revenue growth of 16.49% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
31.21%
Gross profit growth of 31.21% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
134.02%
EBIT growth of 134.02% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
134.02%
Operating income growth of 134.02% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
285.71%
Net income growth of 285.71% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
282.76%
EPS growth of 282.76% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
282.76%
Diluted EPS growth of 282.76% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.18%
Diluted share change of 0.18% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.12%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-291.02%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
176.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 21.71%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
-52.12%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 6.52%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-72.94%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
537.27%
OCF/share CAGR of 537.27% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-63.04%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-62.37%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
4.07%
Below 50% of Energy median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper issues limiting long-term profit growth.
-92.90%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-12.35%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
627.17%
Equity/share CAGR of 627.17% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
36.80%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 36.80% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
-10.95%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
917.44%
Dividend/share CAGR of 917.44% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
208.07%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 208.07% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
-48.79%
Dividend reductions while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
11.12%
AR growth of 11.12% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-33.33%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
0.70%
Asset growth of 0.70% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-2.38%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
5.11%
Debt growth of 5.11% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.78%
SG&A growth of 38.78% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.