40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-21.42%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-28.98%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-57.88%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-57.88%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
50.49%
Net income growth of 50.49% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
50.61%
EPS growth of 50.61% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
50.48%
Diluted EPS growth of 50.48% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.27%
Share change of 0.27% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.35%
Dividend growth of 2.35% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-1.10%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
940.00%
FCF growth of 940.00% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-63.78%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-37.08%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-43.90%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -15.96%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-84.61%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-57.43%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-45.43%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-130.43%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of -21.52%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-1172.56%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -33.84%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-568.09%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -55.84%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-54.65%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-68.92%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
1.71%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 1.71% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
-28.47%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-76.83%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-76.83%
Dividend reductions while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
37.45%
AR growth of 37.45% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-26.47%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-9.54%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-8.46%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-10.00%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.63%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.