Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)

Negative revenue growth while Energy median is -15.16%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.

Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is -0.97%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.

Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 4.19%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.

Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.90%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.

Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.

Diluted share change of 0.81% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.

Dividend cuts while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.

Negative OCF growth while Energy median is -11.04%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.

Negative FCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.

Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -23.86%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.

Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -35.57%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is -6.89%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of -48.64%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.

Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -37.19%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.

Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.

Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.

Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.

Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.

Dividend reductions while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.

AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.

Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.

Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.

Negative BV/share change while Energy median is -1.24%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.

Debt growth of 1.00% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.