PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.50%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-25.93%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-35.41%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-35.41%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-23.20%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-22.73%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-22.73%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.67%
Dividend cuts while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
105.66%
OCF growth of 105.66% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
32.76%
FCF growth of 32.76% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-83.97%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
12.11%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might identify a real advantage vs. struggling peers.
-48.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -32.16%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-91.64%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-73.86%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-78.35%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-80.99%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
116.90%
Net income/share CAGR of 116.90% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
-6.98%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -12.01%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-69.39%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-24.92%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-24.12%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -11.71%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-92.29%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-92.79%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-78.68%
Dividend reductions while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
9.14%
AR growth of 9.14% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.14%
Asset growth of 2.14% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
3.95%
BV/share growth of 3.95% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
1.30%
Debt growth of 1.30% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.81%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.