PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.13%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-45.65%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-134.42%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-134.42%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-200.00%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-200.00%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-198.75%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-2.86%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.18%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-3.92%
Dividend cuts while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
24.67%
OCF growth of 24.67% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
5.51%
FCF growth of 5.51% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-89.33%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-61.36%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -9.66%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
5.56%
3Y CAGR of 5.56% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
-81.09%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-33.13%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
42.08%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Energy median of 7.29%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
-109.83%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-116.13%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
91.64%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 42.94%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-75.19%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-4.53%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -0.38%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-25.92%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -10.16%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-96.29%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-89.89%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-66.27%
Dividend reductions while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
4.25%
AR growth of 4.25% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.12%
Asset growth of 0.12% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-1.30%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.88%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.50%
SG&A growth of 32.50% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.