PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-48.13%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is -2.32%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-69.85%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-116.77%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-116.77%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-123.79%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-118.55%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-118.55%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
28.12%
Share change of 28.12% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
27.89%
Diluted share change of 27.89% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
68.11%
Dividend growth of 68.11% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-5.37%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is -19.44%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-198.57%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is -25.23%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-83.53%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-60.40%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -18.23%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
13.09%
3Y revenue/share growth 50-75% of Energy median of 19.56%. Guy Spier might worry about a waning short-term advantage.
-82.25%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-65.97%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
132.32%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Energy median of 8.36%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
-115.65%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 4.94%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-228.12%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -7.47%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
55.43%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of Energy median. John Neff would seek cost or revenue improvements to match peers.
-72.76%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
20.07%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch sees an advantage over struggling peers in capital accumulation.
29.76%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 29.76% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
-94.27%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-66.69%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
48.51%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 48.51% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
96.71%
AR growth of 96.71% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.32%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.36%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
8.58%
BV/share growth of 8.58% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
41.28%
Debt growth far outpacing Energy median. Jim Chanos suspects over-leveraging or deteriorating financial discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
122.44%
SG&A growth of 122.44% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.