PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
66.40%
Revenue growth of 66.40% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
139.84%
Gross profit growth of 139.84% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
337.00%
EBIT growth of 337.00% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
337.00%
Operating income growth of 337.00% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
237.14%
Net income growth of 237.14% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
222.00%
EPS growth of 222.00% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
222.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 222.00% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
13.06%
Share change of 13.06% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
13.06%
Diluted share change of 13.06% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-21.03%
Dividend cuts while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
71.27%
OCF growth of 71.27% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
175.36%
FCF growth of 175.36% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-70.29%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-30.56%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -13.11%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
246.05%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 8.36%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-74.80%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-36.62%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
569.07%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Energy median of 35.92%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
-23.55%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 39.27%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-33.47%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
134.27%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 66.84%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-77.54%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-21.07%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -8.46%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
25.10%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 25.10% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
-95.48%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-73.17%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
39.31%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 39.31% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
5.50%
AR growth of 5.50% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.29%
Asset growth of 0.29% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-14.50%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
2.84%
Debt growth of 2.84% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.74%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.