PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.95%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is -4.14%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-18.89%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is -3.79%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-41.45%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is -5.52%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-41.45%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is -8.37%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-55.65%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is -14.24%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-54.10%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is -7.89%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-54.10%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is -4.35%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-4.20%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-4.20%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.21%
Dividend growth of 0.21% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-16.56%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
21.79%
FCF growth of 21.79% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-72.63%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-54.13%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -19.71%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
23.99%
3Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Energy median of 16.54%. Mohnish Pabrai would attribute it to strong near-term market positioning.
-84.08%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 1.15%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-39.15%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
163.69%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Energy median of 37.67%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
238.41%
Net income/share CAGR of 238.41% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
-97.03%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -2.73%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-69.51%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 52.14%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-77.43%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-41.49%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -2.15%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
3.28%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 3.28% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
-95.46%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-73.64%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
19.77%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 19.77% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-4.75%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.80%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
3.40%
Positive BV/share change while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch finds a strong advantage vs. peers failing to expand equity.
-1.05%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.84%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.