PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
63.91%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 14.50%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
467.26%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 19.11%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
62.90%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 25.68%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
62.90%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 27.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
65.30%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 23.21%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
65.32%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 23.41%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
65.32%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 23.41%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.00%
Dividend cuts while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
321.37%
OCF growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 3.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see if a superior business model or cost structure drives strong cash generation.
205.19%
FCF growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 12.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see if high profitability or prudent capex drives outperformance.
-72.18%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is -18.40%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-41.29%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -20.80%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
3.54%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a short-term advantage or a successful new product line.
-78.91%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-29.56%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is -0.23%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
3.45%
3Y OCF/share growth of 3.45% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-242.27%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of -52.53%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
20.35%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Energy median. Mohnish Pabrai would check that top-line growth and share count management both contribute.
-487.55%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -25.74%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-85.78%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-58.07%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -10.18%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-53.19%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -8.28%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-90.75%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-59.12%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
28.42%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 28.42% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-6.53%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.75%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-25.90%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is -1.58%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-2.85%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.70%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.