PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
28.40%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 2.24%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
81.45%
Gross profit growth of 81.45% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
60.76%
EBIT growth of 60.76% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
60.76%
Operating income growth of 60.76% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
59.63%
Net income growth of 59.63% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
59.49%
EPS growth of 59.49% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
59.66%
Diluted EPS growth of 59.66% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.28%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.28%
Dividend growth of 0.28% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
45.84%
OCF growth of 45.84% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
164.79%
FCF growth of 164.79% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-39.31%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-3.54%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -0.16%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-5.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -10.06%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-55.53%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
4.46%
OCF/share CAGR of 4.46% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
46.32%
3Y OCF/share growth of 46.32% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-730.97%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
34.70%
5Y net income/share CAGR near Energy median. Charlie Munger might see standard mid-cycle performance in a healthy sector.
-101.34%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -12.99%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-87.41%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-59.50%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -11.30%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-57.18%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -8.81%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-90.72%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-59.95%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
28.73%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 28.73% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-14.75%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.54%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-11.59%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-1.95%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-77.70%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.