40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.73%
Revenue growth 50-75% of Energy median of 9.42%. Guy Spier would worry if the firm is losing market share.
14.09%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x Energy median of 10.93%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if economies of scale justify the premium growth.
104.96%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 20.46%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
104.96%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 22.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
64.88%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 21.41%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
64.56%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 23.54%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
64.56%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 22.36%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
-0.91%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.01%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.35%
Dividend growth of 49.35% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
8.27%
OCF growth near Energy median of 8.27%. Charlie Munger might attribute it to typical sector or cyclical patterns.
21.80%
FCF growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 7.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see if high profitability or prudent capex drives outperformance.
-56.46%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is -2.05%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
21.99%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 10.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
5.31%
3Y CAGR of 5.31% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
-65.22%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
191.43%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 28.75%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
-31.84%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-134.36%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-115.16%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 83.17%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-237.14%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-86.88%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-59.33%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-56.57%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -5.70%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-85.59%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
90.00%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 90.00% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
96.33%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 96.33% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
0.08%
Receivables shrinking more than Energy median. Joel Greenblatt might see strong working capital management or a shift to cash sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.95%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-2.60%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.18%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-9.01%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.01%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.