PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-41.09%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 6.44%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-74.47%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 9.56%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-112.04%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 12.62%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-112.04%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 15.07%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-117.41%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.17%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-117.74%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-117.74%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.81%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.42%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
45.62%
Dividend growth of 45.62% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-7.43%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-26.65%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is -0.55%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-37.45%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
14.66%
5Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Energy median of 18.79%. John Neff would expect a plan to align with peers or surpass them.
51.17%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 10.39%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-36.48%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
388.56%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 26.80%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
22.90%
3Y OCF/share growth 1.25-1.5x Energy median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm if cost advantage or brand strength explains near-term outperformance.
-1248.98%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 17.18%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-142.27%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 62.31%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
6.64%
Below 50% of Energy median. Jim Chanos might see a red flag indicating fundamental short-term issues in profitability or cost control.
-68.37%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-45.73%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-57.09%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -6.01%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-79.76%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
162.09%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 162.09% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
76.26%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 76.26% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
46.22%
Receivables growth far exceeding Energy median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.01%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.83%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-6.93%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.41%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.05%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.73%
SG&A growth of 10.73% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.