40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.01%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-2.20%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-9.43%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-9.43%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is -0.01%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-12.60%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 1.39%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-10.98%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.44%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-11.13%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.83%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.69%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-5.60%
Dividend cuts while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-28.42%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 5.51%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-45.86%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is 0.87%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
101.88%
10Y CAGR of 101.88% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
217.71%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 35.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
98.77%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 28.46%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-50.89%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 22.33%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
107.70%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 71.69%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
33.35%
3Y OCF/share growth near Energy median. Charlie Munger would find it typical for industry-level short-term expansions.
155.59%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 77.89% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
210.93%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 101.79%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
734.12%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 100.79%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-30.80%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-27.52%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-30.81%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-76.47%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
226.56%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 226.56% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
158.99%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 158.99% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-16.39%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-3.68%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
14.62%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-7.25%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.78%
SG&A growth far above Energy median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.