PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.33%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-5.14%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-21.68%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-21.68%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-31.01%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-32.16%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-31.98%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
2.09%
Share change of 2.09% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
1.25%
Diluted share change of 1.25% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
32.49%
Dividend growth of 32.49% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-22.19%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-58.30%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-25.11%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
93.79%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
261.15%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 43.79%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-11.46%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 8.16%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
32.40%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 16.69%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
639.87%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Energy median of 38.78%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
-72.83%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 71.96%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
268.40%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 73.42%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
107.99%
3Y net income/share CAGR near Energy median. Charlie Munger sees standard sector-level performance in the last few years.
3.60%
Equity/share CAGR of 3.60% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
8.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 1.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
65.24%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 17.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-54.90%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
346.01%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 346.01% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
243.78%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 243.78% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-1.56%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.07%
Asset growth of 29.07% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
15.60%
BV/share growth of 15.60% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
51.54%
Debt growth of 51.54% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.06%
SG&A growth of 27.06% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.