PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.24%
Revenue growth near Energy median of 5.16%. Charlie Munger might attribute this to overall industry trends.
-7.67%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 8.79%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-12.05%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 10.99%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-12.05%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 11.76%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
20.83%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 2.94%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
9.63%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.93%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
9.70%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.93%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
9.74%
Share change of 9.74% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
10.17%
Diluted share change of 10.17% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-8.95%
Dividend cuts while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
9.03%
OCF growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 4.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see if a superior business model or cost structure drives strong cash generation.
-62.30%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is 11.78%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
2.67%
10Y CAGR of 2.67% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
46.50%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 12.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
111.30%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 61.39%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-47.72%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 7.29%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-28.55%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 29.37%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
74.44%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Energy median of 48.66%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
16.51%
Below 50% of Energy median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper issues limiting long-term profit growth.
626.55%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 69.60%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
125.34%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Energy median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm expansions or margin boosts drive the short-term advantage.
-4.80%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
2.66%
5Y equity/share CAGR 75-90% of Energy median. John Neff calls for higher returns or more efficient buybacks to match peers.
108.34%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 25.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-58.43%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
310.98%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 310.98% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
226.06%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 226.06% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
21.27%
Receivables growth far exceeding Energy median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.95%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.27%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-6.57%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 1.27%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.14%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.31%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.