PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-11.20%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is -4.23%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-18.65%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is -1.70%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-21.71%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-21.71%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is -0.44%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-60.51%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is -6.56%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-60.19%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is -2.70%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-60.13%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is -3.90%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.95%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.13%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
3.19%
Dividend growth of 3.19% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-49.79%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is -24.73%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-90.09%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is -35.91%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-27.22%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
83.80%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 16.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
31.49%
3Y revenue/share growth near Energy median of 31.49%. Charlie Munger would note typical industry expansions over the short term.
-61.60%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
12.84%
5Y OCF/share growth 50-75% of Energy median. Guy Spier would worry about a persistent shortfall vs. peers.
-23.15%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 26.75%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
60.11%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 25.40% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
224.97%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 72.97%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
5.49%
Below 50% of Energy median. Jim Chanos might see a red flag indicating fundamental short-term issues in profitability or cost control.
7.74%
Equity/share CAGR of 7.74% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
-10.27%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 6.91%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
139.40%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 31.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-13.80%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
158.81%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 158.81% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
221.47%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 221.47% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-3.27%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.77%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-0.09%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.50%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
6.42%
Debt growth of 6.42% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.27%
Our SG&A slightly up while Energy is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we overspend or if the median underinvests in marketing.