PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.64%
Revenue growth of 8.64% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
13.14%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.41%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
-2020.00%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 12.59%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-4550.00%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 12.26%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-165.00%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 11.91%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-165.22%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 10.50%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-177.27%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 10.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.59%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
0.04%
Diluted share change of 0.04% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
1.61%
Dividend growth of 1.61% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-14.41%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is -15.04%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-45.30%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is -12.31%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
10.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR near Energy median of 11.83%. Charlie Munger might expect stable industry trends guiding long-term growth.
-10.27%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 39.03%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
19.45%
3Y CAGR of 19.45% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
5.42%
OCF/share CAGR below 50% of Energy median. Jim Chanos would question if the firm is generating genuine operational cash flow over the long term.
53.88%
5Y OCF/share growth near Energy median. Charlie Munger might attribute it to standard sector conditions for mid-term OCF expansions.
25.98%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Energy median of 7.85%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
94.58%
Net income/share CAGR near Energy median. Charlie Munger might see typical industry-level profit expansion over 10 years.
-137.68%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 102.46%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
34.78%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 4.58%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-38.35%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-1.32%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 30.75%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
112.72%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 29.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
19.47%
Dividend/share CAGR of 19.47% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
224.25%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 224.25% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
48.27%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 48.27% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
12.58%
AR growth of 12.58% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.87%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.14%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-0.86%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.53%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
7.39%
Slightly rising debt while Energy median is deleveraging. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm lags behind peers in risk control or invests in more expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.19%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.