40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Gauges a company's financial stability and solvency. Value investors pay close attention to leverage and liquidity risk, ensuring the company has enough cushion to withstand downturns without impairing shareholder value.
1.41
Dangerously higher D/E above 1.5x PR's 0.07. Jim Chanos would check for potential debt spiral risks.
9.18
Net debt while PR maintains net cash position. John Neff would demand higher returns to justify the additional leverage risk.
1.38
Coverage of 1.38 while PR has no interest expense. Bruce Berkowitz would demand higher returns to justify our leverage.
1.56
Similar current ratio to PR's 1.44. Guy Spier would investigate if industry liquidity norms make sense for both companies.
9.16%
Intangibles of 9.16% while PR has none. Bruce Berkowitz would demand evidence of superior returns on intangible investments.