40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Gauges a company's financial stability and solvency. Value investors pay close attention to leverage and liquidity risk, ensuring the company has enough cushion to withstand downturns without impairing shareholder value.
0.78
Similar D/E to VET's 0.72. Guy Spier would investigate if industry leverage norms make sense for both companies.
3.51
Net debt less than half of VET's 9.01. Charlie Munger would approve but verify if excess conservatism is warranted given competitive dynamics.
-0.98
Negative coverage while VET shows 2.03. Joel Greenblatt would look for operating improvements and turnaround potential.
1.16
Current ratio exceeding 1.5x VET's 0.63. Charlie Munger would verify if this advantage translates to better supplier terms.
15.03%
Intangibles of 15.03% while VET has none. Bruce Berkowitz would demand evidence of superior returns on intangible investments.
