40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.16%
Revenue growth below 50% of BTE's 20.54%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
17.38%
Cost growth above 1.5x BTE's 9.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-17.99%
Gross profit decline while BTE shows 34.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-20.50%
Margin decline while BTE shows 11.74% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.83%
G&A growth above 1.5x BTE's 2.49%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.78%
Other expenses reduction while BTE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.88%
Operating expenses reduction while BTE shows 7.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.20%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x BTE's 8.50%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
-10.40%
Interest expense reduction while BTE shows 44.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.22%
D&A growth less than half of BTE's 4.01%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-13.25%
EBITDA decline while BTE shows 31.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.74%
EBITDA margin decline while BTE shows 9.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-56.00%
Operating income decline while BTE shows 78.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-57.35%
Operating margin decline while BTE shows 47.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.70%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-86.60%
Pre-tax income decline while BTE shows 91.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.02%
Pre-tax margin decline while BTE shows 58.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-78.05%
Tax expense reduction while BTE shows 231.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-89.54%
Net income decline while BTE shows 48.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-89.86%
Net margin decline while BTE shows 22.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-90.63%
EPS decline while BTE shows 46.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-90.63%
Diluted EPS decline while BTE shows 42.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.03%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x BTE's 1.73%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.