40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.07%
Revenue decline while BTE shows 17.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-17.03%
Cost reduction while BTE shows 4.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-15.51%
Gross profit decline while BTE shows 26.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.66%
Margin expansion below 50% of BTE's 8.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.53%
G&A growth less than half of BTE's 14.11%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-700.00%
Other expenses reduction while BTE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.88%
Operating expenses growth less than half of BTE's 2.60%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-8.14%
Total costs reduction while BTE shows 3.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-17.01%
Interest expense reduction while BTE shows 45.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.31%
D&A reduction while BTE shows 12.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
54.02%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x BTE's 2.55%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-64.20%
EBITDA margin decline while BTE shows 14.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-37.21%
Operating income decline while BTE shows 58.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.19%
Operating margin decline while BTE shows 35.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
53.23%
Other expenses growth while BTE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
295.83%
Pre-tax income growth while BTE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
371.61%
Pre-tax margin growth while BTE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
932.14%
Tax expense growth while BTE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
133.62%
Net income growth while BTE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
178.34%
Net margin growth while BTE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
131.25%
EPS growth while BTE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
131.25%
Diluted EPS growth while BTE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.