PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-25.13%
Revenue decline while BTE shows 21.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
1.04%
Cost growth less than half of BTE's 7.73%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-45.65%
Gross profit decline while BTE shows 193.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-27.41%
Margin decline while BTE shows 141.41% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.50%
G&A growth while BTE reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13800.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x BTE's 3.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
29.32%
Operating expenses growth while BTE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.60%
Total costs growth above 1.5x BTE's 6.82%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-11.96%
Interest expense reduction while BTE shows 4.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.09%
D&A growth above 1.5x BTE's 3.30%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-72.90%
EBITDA decline while BTE shows 76.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.31%
EBITDA margin decline while BTE shows 16.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-134.42%
Operating income decline while BTE shows 3928.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-145.98%
Operating margin decline while BTE shows 3215.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
40.68%
Other expenses growth while BTE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-238.13%
Pre-tax income decline while BTE shows 2.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-284.49%
Pre-tax margin decline while BTE shows 20.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-877.78%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-200.00%
Net income decline while BTE shows 6.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-233.57%
Net margin decline while BTE shows 22.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-200.00%
EPS decline while BTE shows 7.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-198.75%
Diluted EPS decline while BTE shows 7.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.86%
Share count reduction while BTE shows 1.18% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.18%
Diluted share reduction while BTE shows 0.13% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.