PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-41.09%
Revenue decline while BTE shows 21.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
17.49%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x BTE's 13.63%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
-74.47%
Gross profit decline while BTE shows 38.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-56.66%
Margin decline while BTE shows 13.35% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.73%
G&A growth 1.1-1.25x BTE's 8.91%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of necessary spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4216.67%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x BTE's 119.57%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
8.61%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x BTE's 0.15%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.29%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x BTE's 12.85%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
-3.90%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.58%
D&A reduction while BTE shows 5.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-94.42%
EBITDA decline while BTE shows 27.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-91.13%
EBITDA margin decline while BTE shows 4.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-112.04%
Operating income decline while BTE shows 44.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-120.44%
Operating margin decline while BTE shows 18.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
26.98%
Other expenses growth while BTE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-117.80%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-130.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-150.00%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-117.41%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-129.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-117.74%
EPS decline while BTE shows 174.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-117.74%
Diluted EPS decline while BTE shows 174.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.81%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.42%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.