PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.24%
Revenue growth below 50% of BTE's 94.24%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
19.71%
Cost growth less than half of BTE's 72.31%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-7.67%
Gross profit decline while BTE shows 175.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-12.27%
Margin decline while BTE shows 41.64% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.31%
G&A reduction while BTE shows 9.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-81.82%
Other expenses reduction while BTE shows 1069.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.76%
Operating expenses reduction while BTE shows 10.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.87%
Total costs growth less than half of BTE's 67.80%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
22.50%
Interest expense growth less than half of BTE's 99.95%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
16.08%
D&A growth less than half of BTE's 79.88%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
4.68%
EBITDA growth below 50% of BTE's 129.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.58%
EBITDA margin decline while BTE shows 21.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.05%
Operating income decline while BTE shows 244.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.44%
Operating margin decline while BTE shows 77.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
21.28%
Other expenses growth while BTE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-10.07%
Pre-tax income decline while BTE shows 381.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.55%
Pre-tax margin decline while BTE shows 147.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-112.87%
Tax expense reduction while BTE shows 127.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
20.83%
Net income growth while BTE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.81%
Net margin growth while BTE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.63%
EPS growth while BTE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.70%
Diluted EPS growth while BTE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.74%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x BTE's 46.61%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
10.17%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x BTE's 46.31%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.