PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.64%
Positive growth while BTE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.30%
Cost increase while BTE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
13.14%
Positive growth while BTE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.15%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x BTE's 1.20%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.19%
G&A reduction while BTE shows 26.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.52%
Other expenses growth while BTE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.84%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x BTE's 5.51%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.81%
Total costs growth while BTE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.49%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.68%
D&A growth while BTE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-36.58%
EBITDA decline while BTE shows 13.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.62%
EBITDA margin decline while BTE shows 15.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4550.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4196.17%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.97%
Other expenses reduction while BTE shows 42.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-91.09%
Pre-tax income decline while BTE shows 317.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.90%
Pre-tax margin decline while BTE shows 325.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.07%
Tax expense growth while BTE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-165.00%
Net income decline while BTE shows 280.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-143.93%
Net margin decline while BTE shows 284.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-165.22%
EPS decline while BTE shows 288.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-177.27%
Diluted EPS decline while BTE shows 287.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.59%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.04%
Diluted share increase while BTE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.