40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.92%
Revenue growth below 50% of CNQ's 36.04%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
4.48%
Cost growth less than half of CNQ's 34.60%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
1.42%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CNQ's 36.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.46%
Margin decline while CNQ shows 0.64% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.40%
Other expenses growth less than half of CNQ's 37.06%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
2.81%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CNQ's 37.32%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3.86%
Total costs growth less than half of CNQ's 35.95%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.47%
D&A reduction while CNQ shows 39.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-6.50%
EBITDA decline while CNQ shows 37.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
27.50%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x CNQ's 22.17%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.43%
Operating income decline while CNQ shows 36.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.26%
Operating margin decline while CNQ shows 0.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-434.26%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-50.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-51.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.67%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-57.44%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-58.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-58.54%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-58.75%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.43%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x CNQ's 8.37%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
2.60%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x CNQ's 8.37%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.