PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.15%
Revenue growth below 50% of CNQ's 34.82%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
16.28%
Cost growth 50-75% of CNQ's 22.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
9.37%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CNQ's 41.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.47%
Margin decline while CNQ shows 5.06% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.25%
Other expenses growth less than half of CNQ's 8.14%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
19.00%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CNQ's 2.95%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
17.29%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x CNQ's 12.34%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.85%
D&A reduction while CNQ shows 4.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-38.64%
EBITDA decline while CNQ shows 52.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.43%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of CNQ's 42.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.15%
Operating income growth below 50% of CNQ's 89.61%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.02%
Operating margin decline while CNQ shows 40.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
96.83%
Other expenses growth while CNQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-63.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-67.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.53%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-68.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-71.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-67.71%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-68.09%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.94%
Share count reduction while CNQ shows 0.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.81%
Diluted share reduction while CNQ shows 0.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.