40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-58.56%
Revenue decline while CNQ shows 0.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.52%
Cost reduction while CNQ shows 2.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-71.47%
Gross profit decline while CNQ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-31.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.49%
G&A growth while CNQ reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.07%
Similar other expenses growth to CNQ's 62.36%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
58.61%
Similar operating expenses growth to CNQ's 66.19%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
24.00%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x CNQ's 16.75%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
2.31%
Interest expense growth while CNQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.75%
D&A growth less than half of CNQ's 8.43%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-83.08%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-63.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-119.12%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-146.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
32.31%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of CNQ's 57.89%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-127.83%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-167.17%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-106.39%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-133.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-181.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-134.37%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-134.90%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.28%
Share count reduction while CNQ shows 0.29% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.55%
Diluted share reduction while CNQ shows 0.29% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.