40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-25.13%
Revenue decline while CNQ shows 11.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
1.04%
Cost growth less than half of CNQ's 3.98%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-45.65%
Gross profit decline while CNQ shows 33.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-27.41%
Margin decline while CNQ shows 19.98% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.50%
G&A growth less than half of CNQ's 3685.71%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13800.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CNQ's 2.17%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
29.32%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CNQ's 664.10%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
12.60%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x CNQ's 9.91%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
-11.96%
Interest expense reduction while CNQ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.09%
D&A growth above 1.5x CNQ's 1.03%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-72.90%
EBITDA decline while CNQ shows 22.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-134.42%
Operating income decline while CNQ shows 16.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-145.98%
Operating margin decline while CNQ shows 4.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
40.68%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of CNQ's 58.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-238.13%
Pre-tax income decline while CNQ shows 60.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-284.49%
Pre-tax margin decline while CNQ shows 43.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-877.78%
Tax expense reduction while CNQ shows 44.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-200.00%
Net income decline while CNQ shows 68.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-233.57%
Net margin decline while CNQ shows 51.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-200.00%
EPS decline while CNQ shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-198.75%
Diluted EPS decline while CNQ shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.86%
Share count reduction while CNQ shows 0.02% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.18%
Diluted share reduction while CNQ shows 0.02% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.